Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector
ثبت نشده
چکیده
This paper examines the policy consequences of how many parties form governments in parliamentary systems. We argue that parties externalize costs not borne by their support groups; and larger parties internalize more costs than small parties because they represent more groups. This argument implies that the public sector should be larger the more parties there are in government. We test this prediction using yearly time series cross sectional data from 1970 to 1998 in 17 European countries, and find that increasing the number of parties in government increases the fraction of GDP accounted for by government spending by close to half a percentage point, or more than one billion current dollars in the typical year. We find little support for the alternative claim that the number of legislative parties affects the size of the public sector, except by way of the number of parties in government.
منابع مشابه
Role of Performance Auditing on Public Accountability Improvement; Emphasis on the Report`s Content
Accountability refers to the commitment of public sector organizations and managers to make decisions about public resources and their other social responsibilities According to agency theory. Efforts to improve public accountability and move towards good governance are the demands of all citizens. One of the tools that can help improve public accountability is the implementation of performance...
متن کاملOptimal Government Spending and Taxation in Three-Sector Endogenous Growth Model-Case Iran
The recent literature on taxation and growth has stressed the optimality of a zero long-run taxation on all accumulative factors of production. For a given path of government spending, the optimal tax plan requires the government to build up a positive stock of public wealth in the short run in the long-run, government spending can be financed with the income accruing from the management of the...
متن کاملHow Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short and LongTerm Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy
Dominant theories of electoral behavior emphasize that voters myopically evaluate policy performance and that this shortsightedness may obstruct the welfare-improving effect of democratic accountability. However, we know little about how long governments receive electoral credit for beneficial policies. We exploit the massive policy response to a major natural disaster, the 2002 Elbe flooding i...
متن کاملRanking the Factors Affecting Corporate Governance in Public Sector Agencies Based on Fuzzy Approach
Purpose: The present study identifies the factors affecting organizational governance in public sector agencies and ranks them according to their importance. Methodology: The study was exploratory, and the data collection method included interviews and questionnaires. The sources of questions were audit reports and budget deductions of the state agencies from 2014 to 2019. Based on the intervi...
متن کاملPreferring a Pound of Cure to an Ounce of Prevention: Retrospective Voting and Failures in Electoral Accountability
Do voters effectively hold elected officials accountable for policy decisions? What are the consequences of failures in electoral accountability? Using a novel dataset on natural disasters, government spending, and election returns, we show that voters reward incumbents for delivering disaster relief spending but not for investing in disaster prevention spending. This failure of electoral accou...
متن کامل